AIB Pest Control

AIB Pest Control for Food Manufacturing, Packing and Distribution Sites

A written IPM programme, mapped devices, documented inspection frequencies and quarterly trend review, built for a standard that scores you rather than passes you

AIB does not issue a pass. It issues a number, and your customer decides what number is acceptable. Integrated Pest Management is one of the five categories that number is built from, and it is the one most often found wanting on a UK site.

At a Glance

What AIB requires for pest control

AIB International’s Consolidated Standards for Inspection make Integrated Pest Management one of five scored categories. The site must hold a written IPM programme setting out its goal, scope and procedures, grounded in the behaviour and biology of the pests it targets.

An annual assessment must cover all areas inside and outside the facility. The work must be done by trained in-house staff or a registered, trained or licensed contractor, with documented competence. Devices must be placed from a detailed survey, recorded on a current site map and inspected at defined frequencies, and pest sighting logs must be reviewed quarterly for trends with documented corrective action.

What the Standard Asks For

The six things the IPM category is built on

AIB is more prescriptive than the UK schemes about how the programme runs day to day, and less prescriptive about the paperwork format. Both catch sites out.

A written IPM programme

Not a contract and a service sheet. A document stating the goal, the scope and the procedures for execution, based on the behaviour and biology of the pests the site actually faces.

An annual facility assessment

Covering all areas inside and outside the building, evaluating the programme’s effectiveness and the conditions that encourage activity. Quarterly in-depth review is treated as best practice.

Documented competence

Trained in-house personnel or a registered, trained or licensed contractor, with certification and GMP training on file rather than asserted.

Devices placed from a survey & mapped

Placement driven by a detailed facility survey, not a standard spacing, with a current site map showing every monitoring device. Published spacings are starting points, not requirements.

Defined inspection frequencies

Exterior rodent devices along foundation walls inspected at least monthly, interior devices in sensitive areas weekly, and insect light traps kept more than 3 metres from food contact surfaces.

Quarterly trend review

A pest sighting log with a designated location, reviewed quarterly to identify patterns of activity, with corrective action documented against what the pattern shows.

How the Score Works

Why an AIB result is a number, not a pass

AIB scores five categories: Operational Methods and Personnel Practices, Maintenance for Food Safety, Cleaning Practices, Integrated Pest Management, and Adequacy of Prerequisite and Food Safety Programs. Each is scored out of 200 and the five add to a possible 1,000. These are the descriptors a category score carries.

200 - No Issues Observed

No identified risk in the category.

180 to 195 - Minor Issues

Observations with no potential to contaminate product.

160 to 175 - Improvement Needed

A potential hazard, or a programme with gaps in part of it.

140 to 155 - Serious

A significant food safety risk, or a programme at risk of failing.

135 or below - Unsatisfactory

An imminent hazard, programme failure, or GMP violation.

The Adequacy rule

The fifth category is calculated so it can never be the highest of the five. Weak documentation therefore caps the whole result, however clean the site looks on the day.

How We Build It

A programme written for a scored inspection, not a pass or fail audit

The written programme, not just the service

A field biologist writes the IPM programme document itself, with the goal, scope and procedures set against the pests your site and your process actually attract, so the first thing an inspector asks for exists.

Survey-led placement and a live map

Device positions come out of a full facility survey rather than a standard spacing, and the map is held in Insectram so it is current on the day rather than current at installation.

Frequencies the standard expects, shared sensibly

AIB expects interior devices in sensitive areas checked weekly, which is more often than a typical UK contract visits. Shield sets a combined programme: technician service visits plus a documented in-house check procedure your staff can run and evidence between them.

Quarterly trend review as standard

Sighting logs and catch data are reviewed quarterly, not annually, with the pattern written up and corrective actions assigned, which is the level AIB treats as best practice.

Where Sites Lose Points

The AIB pest observations we see most often

AIB inspectors look at the programme and the building together. Most lost points come from the gap between the two.

No written IPM programme

A contract, service reports and a bait plan, but no document stating the goal, scope and procedures. The category can be scored down before the walk starts.

A map that is out of date

Devices moved, added or removed with the site map unchanged, so the inspector counts a discrepancy on the floor.

Interior devices checked too infrequently

Eight or twelve contractor visits a year with nothing recorded in between, against an expectation of weekly checks in sensitive areas.

Insect light traps sited over product

Units within 3 metres of an open food contact surface, which is a placement issue and a contamination risk in one observation.

Annual review only

Sighting logs filed all year and looked at once, where quarterly review is the expected practice.

Chemical records incomplete

Application records missing the product name, the location, the date, the time or the applicator’s signature, or safety data sheets not held for every product on site.

Technician recording pest control checks on a tablet beside stacked grain sacks

Our Method

What the first ninety days look like

Survey, written programme, mapped devices, then the first quarterly review

A field biologist surveys the whole site inside and out and writes the IPM programme document, not just a risk assessment. Devices are positioned from that survey, numbered and mapped in Insectram. The service schedule is set alongside a documented in-house check procedure so the frequencies AIB expects are met and evidenced. Chemical records, safety data sheets and labels are loaded into the portal from the first application. At ninety days the first quarterly trend review is produced, so the review cycle is already running before an inspection is booked.

AI Pest Management

Every AIB observation answered from one portal

Every Shield visit ends with a digital report uploaded in real time to Insectram

Insectram holds the written IPM programme, the current device map, every inspection at point level, the pest sighting log, application records with product, location, date and time, safety data sheets and labels, and the quarterly trend reviews. An AIB inspector working through the IPM category can be given direct access and read the evidence at source. Because the map and the records live in the same place, the discrepancy between the drawing and the floor that costs sites points does not build up between visits. AI analytics surface recurring risks and seasonal patterns, while every technical decision stays with your BPCA-qualified technician.

Professional pest management technician holding a tablet displaying a digital pest monitoring dashboard with activity trends and site heat map inside a modern commercial warehouse

The Documentation

What the inspector asks to see in the IPM file

AIB’s documentation expectations are specific. A signed contract with the external provider setting out the services and the emergency arrangements. Evidence of the provider’s registration, licensing and training, plus GMP training. The written IPM programme. A current site map of every monitoring device. Inspection records at device level. Safety data sheets and labels for every pesticide held or used.

Application records naming the product, the location, the date, the time and the applicator, signed. Pesticides stored in a limited-access, locked and ventilated area. A pest sighting log with a designated location, and the quarterly reviews of it with corrective actions closed out. Shield supplies all of it as part of the contract rather than as a pre-inspection exercise.

Food technical manager and pest control technician reviewing a pest-management site plan and compliance records in a hygienic food production facility

Field Biologist Support

The programme document and the review cycle, written by a specialist

The written IPM programme

AIB asks for a programme grounded in current knowledge of pest behaviour and biology. A field biologist writes it for your site and revises it when the process, the fabric or the pressure changes, which is also the annual assessment the standard expects.

Pre-inspection gap review

A documented walk of the IPM category ahead of the inspection, scored the way an inspector would score it, so the points you would have lost are identified while there is still time to recover them.

Attendance and remediation

A field biologist can attend on inspection day and answer technical questions directly. Where an observation is raised you get a corrective action plan with owners, dates and evidence requirements, closed out through the portal.

The Other Standards

The standards that sit alongside AIB

UK sites inspected by AIB are almost always certified to a GFSI scheme as well, usually because a North American customer asks for AIB on top of what the UK retailers already require. The programme is built to satisfy the strictest requirement in the set.

BRCGS

The food industry benchmark: documented IPM, trend analysis of catch data and a named contractor with proven competence.

SALSA (Issue 7)

Proportionate, achievable pest control for smaller UK food and drink producers, without the overhead of a BRCGS-scale system.

Red Tractor

Farm and packing assurance, where pest control works alongside grain storage and livestock operations.

ISO 22000

Pest control as a prerequisite programme inside your wider food safety management system.

FSSC 22000

GFSI-recognised certification, accepted across global supply chains and demanding the same evidence discipline.

HACCP and EHO

The documentation an environmental health officer asks for, and how pest control sits inside your HACCP plan.

Client Feedback

What Shield’s commercial clients say

“Shield’s audit compliance support for our BRCGS certification has been invaluable. Their knowledge of the standards has made our audits much more streamlined.”

M Dunnington

Food Manufacturing

“We’ve been using Shield’s Insectram reporting system and it has changed how we manage pest control. Real-time updates and trend analysis keep us proactive.”

K Firth

Multi-site Facilities

“Shield’s commercial pest control service is impressive. Their technicians are professional and thorough, ensuring our warehouse remains pest-free.”

A Booth

Warehousing

Areas We Cover

AIB pest control across Yorkshire and the North of England

Based in Selby, Shield services food manufacturing, packing, storage and distribution sites inspected against the AIB Consolidated Standards across Yorkshire, the Humber and the North of England. Independent since 2002, BPCA registered, £10m public liability, 24-hour emergency response.

Book a free AIB readiness survey

A Shield field biologist will walk the IPM category the way an inspector would, tell you where the points would go, and set out what it takes to recover them before your inspection date. No obligation.

Name

Frequently Asked Questions

A: AIB does not pass or fail you. Each of the five categories is scored out of 200 and the five add to a possible 1,000, and your customer sets the threshold they will accept. That is why a result can be technically respectable and still cost a contract. It also means Integrated Pest Management is worth up to 200 points in its own right, and that the Adequacy of Programs category is calculated so it can never be the highest of the five, so weak documentation caps everything.

A: More often than a typical UK contract visits. Exterior rodent devices along foundation walls are expected to be inspected at least monthly, and interior devices in sensitive areas weekly. Most UK sites meet that with a combined programme: scheduled technician service visits, plus a documented in-house check procedure that site staff run and record between visits, audited by the contractor.

A: No. AIB allows trained in-house personnel or a registered, trained or licensed contractor, but either way the competence has to be documented, with certification and GMP training on file. Where a contractor is used, a signed contract setting out the services and the emergency arrangements is part of the expected documentation.